Wednesday, February 21, 2007

gender outlaw is gender trouble

i had my gender in the humanities class read kate bornstein's gender outlaw this week and i'm kind of stumped. on one hand i really like this text because it is the first major text written by a transsexual person and she really does go into great detail about what transsexual and transgender issues really involve. i like this text because it assertively puts on the table issues of naming and the male/female binary...the emotional and psychological investments that we have in this binary and the consequences of transgressing the codes of identity that this said binary deploys. however, maybe it's too much of one thing....what i mean by this is that she really focuses on the transgender body as a site of queerness and silence in such a concerted way that other connections that could be made are not even addressed. i'm thinking here of issues involving race and socioeconomic positions. Bornstein is white and she was a male. she really does go into deep discussion over the problem of male privilege but does not identify its relationship to white male privilege. she discusses the implications and the issues of the ways in which the lesbian and gay communities oppresses transgendered/transsexual bodies but again intersections of race and socioeconomic positions are not really addressed. or if they are it is minimal. her discussion of male/female power relationship conflates this dynamic with class conflict....and i find this extremely un-nuanced and problematic. my class also had some trouble with this text as well. however, i must admit their criticisms were all very constructive and i didn't get closed-minded polemical garbage but i fear that my own trepidation regarding the text seeped into my teaching of the text and i am paranoid that my students went away with a somewhat skewed notion of what this text was really about (of course, can we ever determine what any text is ever about?). which is to say, i think that i might have been misread by my students. now nothing happened in class to give me this idea...i guess i'm just a little paranoid...which is something for me to look at a little bit more closely now that i think about it.

2 comments:

Lyra said...

i kinda agree with you in that Kate doesnt go very far into social aspects of white privelage. however, would you agree that race is a subject that has been widely acknowleged that there needs to be equality whereas with gender, specifically male privelage, that is less so? i feel that way. and kate does specifically state that the upper class White male is the top of the pyramid. im not saying its ok to jsut skirt the subject, but it is a pretty specific subject.

do you identify as queer? i do, and more specifically as transgender. when i saw Kate speak, she was a little more angry, a little less loving than i had imagined...i could certainly see her kind of missing the finer points of white privelage...

on the other hand, she grew up Jewish, which seems to me to be a race that has been oppressed as well. perhaps she understands more than you think what being ostracized feels like?

i hope you dont feel like im attacking or criticizing you. these are just my thoughts :)

Lyra said...

oops i suppose reading your bio would have answered my question as to your being queer. :P